[Beowulf] Hyperthreading and 'OS jitter'

[John Hearns]

Several times in the past I have jokingly asked if there shoudl eb another
lower powered CPU core ina  system to run OS tasks (hello Intel - are you
listening?)
Also int he past there was advice to get best possible throughpur on AMD
Bulldozer CPUs to run only on every second core (as they share FPUs).
When I managed a large NUMA system we used cpusets, and the OS ran in a
smal l'boot cpuset' which was physically near the OS disks and IO cards.

I had a thought about hyperthreading though. A few months ago we did a
quick study with Blener rendering, and got 30% more througput with HT
switched on. Also someone who I am workign with now would liek to assess
the effect on their codes of HT on/HT off.
I kow that HT has nromally not had any advantages with HPC type codes - as
the core should be 100% flat out.

I am thinking though - what woud be the effect of enabling HT, and usign a
cgroup to constrain user codes to run on all the odd-numbered CPU cores,
with the OS tasks on the even numbered ones?
I would hope this would be at least performance neutral? Your thoughts
please! Also thoughts on candidate benchmark programs to test this idea.


John Hearns........
 ....... John Hearns
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.beowulf.org/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20170722/4a3dc5f4/attachment.html>