[Beowulf] recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room: full cluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Beat Rubischon beat at 0x1b.chWed Sep 30 07:39:14 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room: full cluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Next message: [Beowulf] recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room: full cluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello! Quoting <tjrc at sanger.ac.uk> (30.09.09 16:19): > Yes, but the tiny road is still useable by the emergency services when > there's been a pileup on the main cariageway, and there are wreckage > and bodies everywhere! I allready saw a lot of Beowulfs where the management network is so rarely used that nobody detects errors. When an emergencie arrives, the operators struggles over the screwed up switches and unplugged cables. So one vote for shared nic. Using Intel boards, this works well since Summer 2006 (Woodcrest, S5000 chipsets), other platforms started to be usable during 2008/2009. Older boards have usually BMCs which are too old to be really stable. But as always: YMMV. Beat -- \|/ Beat Rubischon <beat at 0x1b.ch> ( 0^0 ) http://www.0x1b.ch/~beat/ oOO--(_)--OOo--------------------------------------------------- Meine Erlebnisse, Gedanken und Traeume: http://www.0x1b.ch/blog/
- Previous message: [Beowulf] recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room: full cluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Next message: [Beowulf] recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room: full cluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
