[Beowulf] recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room: full cluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Tim Cutts tjrc at sanger.ac.ukWed Sep 30 07:19:17 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room: full cluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Next message: [Beowulf] recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room: full cluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 30 Sep 2009, at 2:23 pm, Rahul Nabar wrote: > I like the shared socket approach. Building a separate IPMI network > seems a lot of extra wiring to me. Admittedly the IPMI switches can be > configured to be dirt cheap but it still feels like building a extra > tiny road for one car a day when a huge highway with spare capacity > exists right next door carrying thousands of cars. (Ok, cheesy > analogy!) Yes, but the tiny road is still useable by the emergency services when there's been a pileup on the main cariageway, and there are wreckage and bodies everywhere! Tim -- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room: full cluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Next message: [Beowulf] recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room: full cluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
