[Beowulf] recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room: full cluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caWed Sep 30 12:13:29 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room: full cluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Next message: [Beowulf] recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room: full cluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> Yes, but the tiny road is still useable by the emergency services when >> there's been a pileup on the main cariageway, and there are wreckage >> and bodies everywhere! > > I allready saw a lot of Beowulfs where the management network is so rarely > used that nobody detects errors. When an emergencie arrives, the operators > struggles over the screwed up switches and unplugged cables. I think that's insane (no offense intended). same with the comment about crash carts being hard to maneuver. the management network should be constantly used for monitoring; never testing or using it is a serious admin failure IMO. having enough obstructions in your machineroom that you can't move a small cart around is also a serious failure: such a room would necessarily also have disasterous airflow, etc.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room: full cluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Next message: [Beowulf] recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room: full cluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
