[Beowulf] Re: Finally, a solution for the 64 core 4TB RAM market
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comThu May 28 08:11:37 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Finally, a solution for the 64 core 4TB RAM market
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Finally, a solution for the 64 core 4TB RAM market
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jason Riedy wrote: > code, and the sequential/slow parts are faster. The main > difference will be in I/O, but bumping the memory way up will make > I/O less important for many uses. Er ... ah ... no. It will only delay the inevitable. It won't eliminate it. Blue Gene units have massive main memories. And they aim for very fast IO. Same with most of the other big iron. If you have to do IO, you should do it as fast as you can do it (safely), so you can minimize that fraction spent in serial IO operations. Yeah, MPI-IO ... parallel operations across a collection of inherently serial resources ... -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics, email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://scalableinformatics.com http://scalableinformatics.com/jackrabbit phone: +1 734 786 8423 x121 fax : +1 866 888 3112 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Finally, a solution for the 64 core 4TB RAM market
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Finally, a solution for the 64 core 4TB RAM market
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
