[Beowulf] Re: Finally, a solution for the 64 core 4TB RAM market
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jason Riedy jason at acm.orgThu May 28 07:45:01 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Finally, a solution for the 64 core 4TB RAM market
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Finally, a solution for the 64 core 4TB RAM market
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
And Mark Hahn writes: > while I like the idea of these being available, I wonder where the > real (big) market is. You mean other than commercial / HR databases that were built on Sun's SMPs and now have a questionable upgrade path? Likely replacing current mid-range, <100-node clusters with a single box. MPI code still runs, you gain easy access to threaded code, and the sequential/slow parts are faster. The main difference will be in I/O, but bumping the memory way up will make I/O less important for many uses. Not considering memory, prices a bit below 20+ dual-core nodes + interconnect cost would make it a no-brainer. Depending on the I/O and memory density trade-off, and assuming the manufacturing costs are reasonable, this could support a pretty large profit... Jason
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Finally, a solution for the 64 core 4TB RAM market
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Finally, a solution for the 64 core 4TB RAM market
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
