[Beowulf] Re: Finally, a solution for the 64 core 4TB RAM market
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caThu May 28 22:26:27 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Finally, a solution for the 64 core 4TB RAM market
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Finally, a solution for the 64 core 4TB RAM market
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> while I like the idea of these being available, I wonder where the >> real (big) market is. > > You mean other than commercial / HR databases that were built on > Sun's SMPs and now have a questionable upgrade path? when I look at Sun's high-end boxes, I see either webservers (the many-thread stuff) or kind of sad old-fashioned sparc minis. the latter would probably lose out to a decent modern dual-socket box (dual nehalem like the HP DL760). the question is how much volume there is in the >= 8-socket market, and I don't mean "how many PHB's can be persuaded they need one because they're important". > Likely replacing current mid-range, <100-node clusters with a > single box. unclear to me. a current mid-range 100-node cluster is 800 cores, and I don't think we're talking about that in an SMP. Intel's recent nehalem-ex preview was 128 hyperthreads (64 real). I would guess that most people who currently have clusters would rather get bigger/faster/cooler clusters, rather than go to SMP, unless for some reason they have a fixed problem size. possible, I guess.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Finally, a solution for the 64 core 4TB RAM market
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Finally, a solution for the 64 core 4TB RAM market
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
