[Beowulf] RE: Compare and contrast MPI implementations
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jeffrey B. Layton laytonjb at charter.netThu Dec 15 14:57:31 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RE: Compare and contrast MPI implementations
- Next message: [Beowulf] RE: Compare and contrast MPI implementations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Mathog wrote: >>MPI detente is possible. Check out the modules package. >> >>http://modules.sourceforge.net/ >> >> > >Sort of the same problem though. lamboot (from lam-mpi) assumes >that hboot is in the path. There's no time before it invokes >hboot to run "modules". If there were a preceding stage in >this instance just using an export statement with PATH would >have done the trick. > > Actually, you can. We do this at work all of the time. As Doug said in another post, you just put, module load blah in your queuing script and it loads the correct module that should have the paths and environment variables all set (if you configure the modules correctly). At work I routinely run binaries that load various MPI libs at the same time. It's rather easy using modules. Jeff
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RE: Compare and contrast MPI implementations
- Next message: [Beowulf] RE: Compare and contrast MPI implementations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
