[Beowulf] RE: Compare and contrast MPI implementations
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pathscale.comWed Dec 21 17:44:42 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RE: Compare and contrast MPI implementations
- Next message: [Beowulf] RE: Compare and contrast MPI implementations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 05:11:29PM +0000, John Hearns wrote: > On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:52 -0800, Greg Lindahl wrote: > > Our artificial-stupidity "pathopt" utility can do a pretty good job of > > magically finding the right compiler flags, but it's not that fast at > > producing the answer. > Well, you need to run it on one of these Beowulf clusters to make it faster. Oddly enough, we did add some hooks so that you can run all of the sub-jobs on a cluster. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RE: Compare and contrast MPI implementations
- Next message: [Beowulf] RE: Compare and contrast MPI implementations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
