[Beowulf] dollars-per-teraflop : any lists like the Top500?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caWed Jun 30 23:20:41 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Beowulf] dollars-per-teraflop : any lists like the Top500?
- Next message: [Beowulf] dollars-per-teraflop : any lists like the Top500?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> (whether capital or life cycle). Nobody is going to pay more just because > the vendor did a stunt of one sort or another. I agree: vendor stunts are advertising. but think of them as like a mating display - elaborate feathers or a big rack of antlers. they make a claim of fitness that speaks mainly to a customer's risk-aversion: if IBM/Cray/etc can make some giant cluster work, then surely our little cluster project will succeed. if you have more in-house expertise, you may not value this as much. in a sense, this factor is anti-beowulf, since the expectation for really commoditized parts is that they'll Just Work. with some modest care, you can be pretty confident that the software stack will Just Work. especially with open-source, which provides greater access and fixability. so most of the value of brand boils down to hardware/firmware-level issues that customers are not well-equipped to deal with those, either at bid-eval time or once the deal is done. my perception, though, is that vendors try to pretend such problems don't happen, rather than bragging about how well they solve them... regards, mark hahn.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] dollars-per-teraflop : any lists like the Top500?
- Next message: [Beowulf] dollars-per-teraflop : any lists like the Top500?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
