[Beowulf] Peformance penalty when using 128-bit reals on AMD64
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comSat Jun 26 17:39:34 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Peformance penalty when using 128-bit reals on AMD64
- Next message: [Beowulf] Peformance penalty when using 128-bit reals on AMD64
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 03:40:24PM -0700, NiftyOMPI Tom Mitchell wrote: > In a 30 second scan of GMP's arbitrary precision library I cannot tell > if 32 and 64bit sizes fall out as equal in performance to native types. No. It's great for arbitrary large sizes and not so good for 128 bits, compared to a library that does only 128 bits. It makes no attempt to do 64 or 32 bit stuff using native types. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Peformance penalty when using 128-bit reals on AMD64
- Next message: [Beowulf] Peformance penalty when using 128-bit reals on AMD64
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
