[Beowulf] recommendations for cluster upgrades
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Rahul Nabar rpnabar at gmail.comWed May 13 16:20:03 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] recommendations for cluster upgrades
- Next message: [Beowulf] recommendations for cluster upgrades
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Greg Keller <Greg at keller.net> wrote: > Nehalem is a huge step forward for Memory Bandwidth hogs. We have one code > that is extremely memory bandwidth sensitive that i Thanks Greg. A somewhat naiive question I suspect. What's the best way to test the "memory bandwidth sensitivity" of my code? Given the fact that I have only the AMD Opterons available currently. Any active / passive tests that can throw some metrics out at me? I don't think our codes have been very well profiled in the past and this might be the first time we are approaching this process so rationally. -- Rahul
- Previous message: [Beowulf] recommendations for cluster upgrades
- Next message: [Beowulf] recommendations for cluster upgrades
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
