[Beowulf] recommendations for cluster upgrades
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Keller Greg at keller.netTue May 12 17:05:41 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] recommendations for cluster upgrades
- Next message: [Beowulf] recommendations for cluster upgrades
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rahul, > > I'm currently shopping around for a cluster-expansion and was shopping > for options. Anybody out here who's bought new hardware in the recent > past? Any suggestions? Any horror stories? > Nehalem is a huge step forward for Memory Bandwidth hogs. We have one code that is extremely memory bandwidth sensitive that is 400% faster than on our previous "Harperton" quad core solution from intel. This is a cumulative effect of having enough memory BW to use all the cores and better Memory and Cache performance. It's a must see if you suspect memory bandwidth is important, and until the next Gen of AMD is available with 4 channels per socket it's going to win a lot of business from me. > For some reason the top500 sublists seem skewed to prefer the Intel > Xeons. Why so few Opterons or any other AMD hardware? Just curious if > this is driven by technological inferiority of only a marketing > effect. My vendor seems to be trying to steer me towards an Intel > Nehalem or Clovertown for whatever reasons good or bad. > AMD Barcelona was the first 4 flops per cycle processor from AMD, and it hit the street with some problems right when the list was coming out in end of 2007. I expect those are great processors now (and a more technically challenging design than intel's in some regards), but may have skewed the top500 list because Intel's 4 flops per cycle chips (Woodcrest/Cloverton) were out a year earlier. The essential difference... Intel packages multiple "dual core" processor packages onto a single die to get their "Quad Core" Cloverton. They pairs have some shared cache but not all 4. AMD integrated the Cache on all 4 cores, and did some neat tricks with the Floating point units, which had the side effect of leaving less cache per core and a longer time to market. Hope this helps.... if you really want to stretch your upgrade $$ you may be able to swap the Processor in your existing 1435's with the latest chip which sounds good on paper at least. I'd love to hear if anyone actually does that type of upgrade on "real" production clusters. Full Disclosure: I am a former Dell HPCC architect and a Dell customer. Cheers! Greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] recommendations for cluster upgrades
- Next message: [Beowulf] recommendations for cluster upgrades
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
