[Beowulf] Wired article about Go machine
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Robert G. Brown rgb at phy.duke.eduThu Mar 26 07:42:52 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Wired article about Go machine
- Next message: [Beowulf] Wired article about Go machine
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Leif Nixon wrote: > "Robert G. Brown" <rgb at phy.duke.edu> writes: > >> Not only are they told what to do -- in banks in particular, they cannot >> make ANY CHANGE in ANY COMPUTER SYSTEM associated with the actual >> banking process without going through an extensive and expensive >> auditing and certification process. > > As in health-care. Which is why you get hospitals with > Conficker/Downadup running rampant through medical equipment with > embedded Windows systems. Basically, you're not allowed to patch them > without FDA approval. > > That's scary. Um, I don't believe that this is the case, and I say this as a semi-pro consultant in health care. Most hospitals probably do something along these lines as part of the standard CYA, but the regulations, especially HIPAA, are "due diligence" recommendations with an amazing {\em lack} of specification. You can pretty much do whatever you like, but heaven help you if you drop your patients' data or violate their confidentiality. At the very least you'd better be able to show that you tried hard to keep things secure... This leads to an extremely wide range of IT practice in the EMR revolution that congress has more or less mandated as a condition of getting paid for medicare and medicaid. Very small practices run whatever they can manage, usually a small/cheap EMR on a Windows server, with virtually unsecured Windows clients -- again, pretty much whatever Windows systems one happens to own, with whatever mix of Win95 on up on systems up to 8 or 9 years old that happen to be lying around. Seriously. No regulation, no government certification process, no full time IT staff -- if you're lucky (or hire a good consultant:-) they'll figure out that they need actual antivirus on all of their systems, regular Windows updates on their server and clients, and that they shouldn't use WEP on their over-the-counter wireless network. Intermediate practices (like the one I do most of my consulting for) start OUT like that -- it had a 10 year old SOLARIS x86 server and a truly terrifying mix of PCs when I started out (and the Solaris server is still running, sort of, under a desk, 4 GB hard drives and all -- go figure:-). Now it runs with locked down linux servers running vmware, a mix of linux and windows vm servers (including the primary EMR under LINUX, thankfully, data relatively protected) and I still view the goddamn WinXX PC clients to be the weak link in the security of the whole system, but we have no choice. Only hospitals are as slow and ponderous as you describe (my sister works for ex-A4healthsys, and has been doing hospital systems for close to 20 years now). They aren't ponderous because of the need for certification, but because they are ponderous and because of the expense of change. Which is what keeps my sister in business, basically -- she goes around and messes with the infinite problems in the legacy hospital management suites running on antique hardware being managed by borderline incompetents when the original authors of those suites are long since gone, the operating systems are no longer supported, the hardware is obsolete and breaks a lot, and the underlying database is something of dark evil. Believe me, I know, as she bends my ear a lot and asks me for help with perl scripts designed to scrape the data out of this or that nightmarish interface. rgb > > -- > Leif Nixon - Systems expert > ------------------------------------------------------------ > National Supercomputer Centre - Linkoping University > ------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > Robert G. Brown http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/ Duke University Dept. of Physics, Box 90305 Durham, N.C. 27708-0305 Phone: 1-919-660-2567 Fax: 919-660-2525 email:rgb at phy.duke.edu
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Wired article about Go machine
- Next message: [Beowulf] Wired article about Go machine
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
