[Beowulf] Re: typical latencies for gigabit ethernet
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Patrick Geoffray patrick at myri.comMon Jun 29 15:20:40 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: typical latencies for gigabit ethernet
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: typical latencies for gigabit ethernet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dave Love wrote: > That's something I haven't seen. However, I'm only using rx-frames=1 > because simply adjusting rx-usec doesn't behave as expected. Instead of rx-usecs being the time between interrupts, it is sometimes implemented as the delay between the the first packet and the following interrupt, which is obviously wrong. rx-frames may generate an interrupt storm if you receive a stream of small packets. You may want to measure how many interrupts per second are produced in this case, compared to using rx-usecs. Patrick
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: typical latencies for gigabit ethernet
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: typical latencies for gigabit ethernet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
