[Beowulf] Re: typical latencies for gigabit ethernet
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Dave Love d.love at liverpool.ac.ukMon Jun 29 14:57:32 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: typical latencies for gigabit ethernet
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: typical latencies for gigabit ethernet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Scott Atchley <atchley at myri.com> writes: > As Patrick kindly pointed out, you are using rx-frames and not rx- > usec. They are not equivalent. That's something I haven't seen. However, I'm only using rx-frames=1 because simply adjusting rx-usec doesn't behave as expected. (It's documented, but perhaps only in the ethtool source, that rx-frames=0 means to use just rx-usec, which is what you want to be able to adjust the coalescence as suggested.)
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: typical latencies for gigabit ethernet
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: typical latencies for gigabit ethernet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
