[Beowulf] Consumer vs. Enterprise Hard Drives in Clusters
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Erwan Velu erwan at seanodes.comThu Jan 29 06:13:11 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Consumer vs. Enterprise Hard Drives in Clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] Consumer vs. Enterprise Hard Drives in Clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bill Broadley wrote: > I found my actual results from a WD consumer 320GB drive (single platter) with > the drive on the bench vs inside a 1U node: > > http://cse.ucdavis.edu/bill/wd320-2MB-points.png > > http://cse.ucdavis.edu/bill/wd320-2MB-points-vibration.png > > Once the WD320 (a consumer drive) was replaced with a seagate es2 (raid > edition drive): > > http://cse.ucdavis.edu/bill/seagate-es.png > Hey Bill, Are we sure the only difference between both cases are only the vibrations ? Do you use the same disk controller in all cases ? Does the workload is exactly the same ? Does the interconnect is the same ? Cheers,
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Consumer vs. Enterprise Hard Drives in Clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] Consumer vs. Enterprise Hard Drives in Clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
