[Beowulf] Consumer vs. Enterprise Hard Drives in Clusters
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bill Broadley bill at cse.ucdavis.eduTue Jan 27 22:52:25 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Consumer vs. Enterprise Hard Drives in Clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] Consumer vs. Enterprise Hard Drives in Clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I found my actual results from a WD consumer 320GB drive (single platter) with the drive on the bench vs inside a 1U node: http://cse.ucdavis.edu/bill/wd320-2MB-points.png http://cse.ucdavis.edu/bill/wd320-2MB-points-vibration.png Once the WD320 (a consumer drive) was replaced with a seagate es2 (raid edition drive): http://cse.ucdavis.edu/bill/seagate-es.png So while it's dangerous to over generalize, I'd say the seagate ES2 is dramatically more vibration resistant than the 320GB WD consumer drive I tested. My best guess is that is not uncommon, and when I manage to pry a decent spec sheet out of vendor they do show dramatically different vibration specifications. So while I encourage folks to try the 2TB WD consumer drive in a 48 drive array and report back, my expectations are low. Personally I'll wait, I'm sure both Seagate and WD will ship over 1TB raid editions at some point.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Consumer vs. Enterprise Hard Drives in Clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] Consumer vs. Enterprise Hard Drives in Clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
