[Beowulf] performance tweaks and optimum memory configs for a Nehalem
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jonathan Dursi ljdursi at scinet.utoronto.caSun Aug 9 08:52:00 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] performance tweaks and optimum memory configs for a Nehalem
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: [Paraview] VTK under ParaView
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 7-Aug-09, at 7:59PM, Rahul Nabar wrote: > Is it a bad mistake to configure a Nehalem (2 sockets quad core giving > a total of 8 cores; E5520) with 16 GB RAM (4 DIMMs of 4GB each)? It depends. You'll have to do the timings with your codes; with mine (a uniform grid explicit hydrodynamics code; memory limited, with extremely regular memory access patterns) I saw a pretty robust 10% performance difference between a 16GB `unbalanced' and an 18GB `balanced' memory configuration. You'll have to do the measurements and decide if the resulting performance gain is worth the cost... - Jonathan -- Jonathan Dursi <ljdursi at scinet.utoronto.ca>
- Previous message: [Beowulf] performance tweaks and optimum memory configs for a Nehalem
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: [Paraview] VTK under ParaView
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
