[Beowulf] performance tweaks and optimum memory configs for a Nehalem
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caSat Aug 8 15:47:47 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] performance tweaks and optimum memory configs for a Nehalem
- Next message: [Beowulf] performance tweaks and optimum memory configs for a Nehalem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Is it a bad mistake to configure a Nehalem (2 sockets quad core giving > a total of 8 cores; E5520) with 16 GB RAM (4 DIMMs of 4GB each)? I there's no ambiguity here: unpopulated channels decrease bandwidth and/or concurrency. (does anyone know whether nehalem can "ungang" memory channels like opteron can? it would be fascinating to see benchmarks showing a benefit to higher memory concurrency for a manycore workload...) > Our code requirements dictate 2 GB / core is enough. Should I be > paying for the additional RAM to make it 24 GB? ram is, historically and relatively, cheap. otoh, can your code get by with 1.5G/core? actually, I tend to see some association with smallish memory footprints (2G/core is definitely not large) with cache-friendliness. this would argue that the higher bandwidth may not make much difference to your code... regards, mark hahn.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] performance tweaks and optimum memory configs for a Nehalem
- Next message: [Beowulf] performance tweaks and optimum memory configs for a Nehalem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
