[Beowulf] performance tweaks and optimum memory configs for a Nehalem
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Rahul Nabar rpnabar at gmail.comSat Aug 8 16:50:40 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] performance tweaks and optimum memory configs for a Nehalem
- Next message: [Beowulf] performance tweaks and optimum memory configs for a Nehalem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Gus Correa<gus at ldeo.columbia.edu> wrote: > Some people are reporting good results when using the > Nehalem hypethreading feature (activated on the BIOS). > When the code permits, this virtually doubles the number > of cores on Nehalems. > That feature works very well on IBM PPC-6 processors > (IBM calls it "simultaneous multi-threading" SMT, IIRR), > and scales by a factor of >1.5, at least with the atmospheric > model I tried. Thanks for all the useful comments, Gus! Hyperthreading is confusing the hell out of me. I expected to see 8 cores in cat /proc/cpuinfo Now I see 16. (This means I must have left hyperthreading on I guess; I ought to go to the server room; reboot and check the BIOS) This is confusing my benchmarking too. Let's say I ran an MPI job with -np 4. If there was no other job on this machine would hyperthreading bring the other CPUs into play as well? The reason I ask is this: I have noticed that a single 4 core job is slower than two 4 core jobs run simultanously. This seems puzzling to me. -- Rahul
- Previous message: [Beowulf] performance tweaks and optimum memory configs for a Nehalem
- Next message: [Beowulf] performance tweaks and optimum memory configs for a Nehalem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
