[Beowulf] Nehalem memory configs
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jason Clinton jclinton at advancedclustering.comSun Apr 12 20:53:59 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Nehalem memory configs
- Next message: [Beowulf] Nehalem memory configs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Jason Clinton < jclinton at advancedclustering.com> wrote: > No, it does not degrade performance as long as the CAS latencies of both > DIMM types are identical and you would not get a clock-down by using that > quantity of RAM ranks. We have been able to attain Intel's reported, magical > 35GB/s number using ICC. GCC 4.3 is around 31GB/s. (At 1333MHz.) > I should qualify those numbers a little: when using any quantity of RAM exceeding 1 DIMM per channel, they clock down to 1066MHz, and benchmark at 33 GB/s w/ ICC and 29 GB/s with GCC 4.3. It doesn't matter if they are different sizes or not. The 35GB/s number is for single-populated memory configurations. -- Jason D. Clinton, 913-643-0306 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20090412/c60bc7aa/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Nehalem memory configs
- Next message: [Beowulf] Nehalem memory configs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
