Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

[Beowulf] Nehalem memory configs

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Jason Clinton jclinton at advancedclustering.com
Sun Apr 12 20:43:31 PDT 2009


On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Peter Kjellstrom <cap at nsc.liu.se> wrote:

> Can anyone confirm that mixing different sizes of dimms, even when keeping
> to
> a by-three-symmetric configuration, actually does degrade performance?
>
> That is, first hand information that config 1 will be slower than config 2:
>
> 1: two sockets, 3x 1G and 3x 2G per socket RDIMM (total 18G @1066)
> 2: two sockets, 6x 1G(or 2G) per socket RDIMM (total 12G (or 24G) @1066)


No, it does not degrade performance as long as the CAS latencies of both
DIMM types are identical and you would not get a clock-down by using that
quantity of RAM ranks. We have been able to attain Intel's reported, magical
35GB/s number using ICC. GCC 4.3 is around 31GB/s. (At 1333MHz.)

We're a little reticent to approach this, though. It's certainly easier to
explain whole units of divisible RAM quantities to customers. The whole
tri-channel memory thing is already hard enough to have a conversation
about. Especially when people write their specs as X GB of memory per
core--where X is power of two.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20090412/d0a79088/attachment.html


More information about the Beowulf mailing list