[Beowulf] Re: Rackable / SGI
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comSat Apr 4 14:35:33 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Rackable / SGI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Rackable / SGI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jason Riedy wrote: > And Joe Landman writes: >> Good performance: >> ------------------ >> GlusterFS >> PVFS2 > > I don't suppose you've experimented with Ceph or POHMELFS? I just Ceph yes a little. Looking forward to it being sufficiently stable to use in production. POHMELFS, not yet. Looked at it and it looks very interesting. Wasn't sure of current state. > attempted to build Lustre support for experimenting and remembered > why I avoid it. :) I am dealing with interface blocks right now to have a fortran code call a C code correctly. Ugh... But I understand your pain. Building GlusterFS is quite easy, and the stacking is quite logical. Only issues we have run into is that sometimes fuse crashes. > > And Lustre already is in an odd spot. One high-level competitor to > Sun uses it, HP. Then there's Cray (where there was some joking > that they could buy SGI at that price and extract revenge)… I have lots of friends at both places. Sad situation. Cray will grow and thrive. SGI has basically evaporated. Though I am seeing some of their technology get open sourced very rapidly. Joe > > Jason -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics LLC, email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com http://jackrabbit.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423 x121 fax : +1 866 888 3112 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Rackable / SGI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Rackable / SGI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
