[Beowulf] Re: Rackable / SGI
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jason Riedy jason at acm.orgSat Apr 4 14:29:19 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Rackable / SGI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Rackable / SGI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
And Joe Landman writes: > Good performance: > ------------------ > GlusterFS > PVFS2 I don't suppose you've experimented with Ceph or POHMELFS? I just attempted to build Lustre support for experimenting and remembered why I avoid it. And Lustre already is in an odd spot. One high-level competitor to Sun uses it, HP. Then there's Cray (where there was some joking that they could buy SGI at that price and extract revenge)… Jason
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Rackable / SGI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Rackable / SGI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list