Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

[Beowulf] SuperMicro and lm_sensors

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Karen Shaeffer shaeffer at neuralscape.com
Wed Jun 18 18:47:44 PDT 2008


On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 06:14:20PM -0700, Greg Lindahl wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 03:11:54PM -0700, Greg Lindahl wrote:
> 
> > Speaking of lm_sensors, does anyone have configs for recent SuperMicro
> > mobos? My SuperMicro support contact doesn't have ay idea, and running
> > sensors-detect leaves me with lots of readings which are
> > miscalibrated.
> 
> Thanks to the 3 people who wrote me with suggestions.
> 
> It appears that the magic is this:
> 
> * Upgrade to a newer version of lm_sensors (atrpms has 2.10.6,
>    dunno if you can find lm_sensors3 rpms anywhere)
> * Make sure your kernel has a driver for what sensors-detect
>    detects
> 
> Since I'm on CentOS 5.1, I was behind in both respects, and the result
> is that "sensors" prints nonsense -- it doesn't help that all of my
> boxes have 2 winbond chips in them, with the older one being detected
> and having a driver and having none of the interesting signals.
> 
> With both updates I get reasonable numbers.
> 
> -- greg

Hi Greg,
I have some experience with lm_sensors. And you are correct
that the 2.10.x release is required for many currrent system
boards and recent kernels. But that isn't enough, depending on
your system board. In particular, I have seen some cases where
the temperatures are mislabeled. Unless the system board
manufacturer gives you a configuration file, you might need to
verify the mapping of the temperature labels to specific devices.
YMMV.

Thanks,
Karen
-- 
 Karen Shaeffer
 Neuralscape, Palo Alto, Ca. 94306
 shaeffer at neuralscape.com  http://www.neuralscape.com



More information about the Beowulf mailing list