[Beowulf] SuperMicro and lm_sensors
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comWed Jun 18 18:14:20 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SuperMicro and lm_sensors
- Next message: [Beowulf] SuperMicro and lm_sensors
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 03:11:54PM -0700, Greg Lindahl wrote: > Speaking of lm_sensors, does anyone have configs for recent SuperMicro > mobos? My SuperMicro support contact doesn't have ay idea, and running > sensors-detect leaves me with lots of readings which are > miscalibrated. Thanks to the 3 people who wrote me with suggestions. It appears that the magic is this: * Upgrade to a newer version of lm_sensors (atrpms has 2.10.6, dunno if you can find lm_sensors3 rpms anywhere) * Make sure your kernel has a driver for what sensors-detect detects Since I'm on CentOS 5.1, I was behind in both respects, and the result is that "sensors" prints nonsense -- it doesn't help that all of my boxes have 2 winbond chips in them, with the older one being detected and having a driver and having none of the interesting signals. With both updates I get reasonable numbers. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SuperMicro and lm_sensors
- Next message: [Beowulf] SuperMicro and lm_sensors
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
