[Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caThu Feb 28 12:45:52 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> How do your Rate numbers correlate to the max bandwitdh of 32GB/s > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GeForce_8_Series)? good point. I had assumed the quoted numbers were merely in-cache, but it does claim to be running on array size 2e6 (8e6 bytes), which seems a bit large for in-cache. (though very small for a Stream run). >> http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=52686 this quotes a plausible 64-65 GB/s on a C870 (76.8 peak theoretical). >> Running this on my 8600 card I get: >> >> STREAM Benchmark implementation in CUDA >> Array size (single precision)=2000000 >> using 128 threads per block, 15625 blocks >> Function Rate (MB/s) Avg time Min time Max time >> Copy: 291777.6696 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 >> Scale: 291777.6696 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 >> Add: 437666.5043 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 >> Triad: 437666.5043 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 this is implausible. my guess is the timing code is broken.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
