[Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caThu Feb 28 13:02:00 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> STREAM Benchmark implementation in CUDA > Array size (single precision)=8000000 > using 128 threads per block, 62500 blocks > Function Rate (MB/s) Avg time Min time Max time > Copy: 16706.3212 0.0039 0.0038 0.0044 > Scale: 16666.2770 0.0046 0.0038 0.0100 > Add: 18408.0866 0.0053 0.0052 0.0056 > Triad: 18738.6603 0.0052 0.0051 0.0055 I got STREAM Benchmark implementation in CUDA Array size (single precision)=8000000 using 128 threads per block, 62500 blocks Copy: 50006.6051 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 Scale: 50006.6051 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 Add: 56409.8044 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 Triad: 56409.8044 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 on a "nVidia Corporation G80 [Quadro FX 4600] (rev a2)". wikipedia quotes 67.2 GB/s theoretical. it didn't matter whether the machine was in init 3 or 5, though the X config was just an idle 1280x1024 server. > Kudos to Nvidia for having a linux friendly toolchain that I could find, > download, install, and compile a code with minimal hassle. absolutely. AMD has really dropped the ball on this, even though it looks like they at least announced availability of DP earlier...
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
