[Beowulf] Barcelona vs. Woodcrest, computational chemistry research
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comWed Sep 26 09:00:55 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Barcelona vs. Woodcrest, computational chemistry research
- Next message: [Beowulf] Barcelona vs. Woodcrest, computational chemistry research
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Andrew: andrew holway wrote: > Multi reference quantum chem. Gaussian and Molcas. Without doing a benchmark it will be quite hard to indicate which one may be faster. Barcelona is a quad core with a good memory system (relative to the Clovertown). If your problems are large enough to spill to disk for matrix elements, then it isn't likely that the CPU performance would be the dominating factor. If you have enough ram that your problem remains in ram (as I remember, multi-reference qchem tends to be ... large ...) then you may find that your performance is more dominated by memory access patterns, for which Barcelona might be better. If you were doing pure DFT, well, that can, for some problems, fit almost entirely in cache. In which case, it makes sense to get the largest cache chip you can get. As usual, real use case tests are the most realistic predictor of performance. Joe > Andy -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics LLC, email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com http://jackrabbit.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423 fax : +1 866 888 3112 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Barcelona vs. Woodcrest, computational chemistry research
- Next message: [Beowulf] Barcelona vs. Woodcrest, computational chemistry research
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
