[Beowulf] Barcelona vs. Woodcrest, computational chemistry research
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
andrew holway andrew at moonet.co.ukWed Sep 26 06:03:59 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Barcelona vs. Woodcrest, computational chemistry research
- Next message: [Beowulf] Barcelona vs. Woodcrest, computational chemistry research
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Multi reference quantum chem. Gaussian and Molcas. Andy On 26/09/2007, John Leidel <john.leidel at gmail.com> wrote: > What chem codes are you going to be running [NWChem?] > > > On 9/26/07, andrew holway <andrew at moonet.co.uk> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I am looking at chips for a small 20 node cluster for computational > > chemistry. I'm trying to get my head around the various merits of the > > different ways the cache work. > > > > Considering the fairly chunky bits of data that are going to be going > > through, does anyone have any opinion on how the new 1.9 Barcelona > > will perform against a 2.66 woodcrest. Is the Intel front side bus > > going to be a significant bottleneck for this type of application? > > > > Cheers > > > > Andy > > _______________________________________________ > > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > > > >
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Barcelona vs. Woodcrest, computational chemistry research
- Next message: [Beowulf] Barcelona vs. Woodcrest, computational chemistry research
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
