[Beowulf] New beowulf recommendations
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caMon Sep 10 07:02:52 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] New beowulf recommendations
- Next message: [Beowulf] New beowulf recommendations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> What is GAMMA like for stability these days? It's efficiency would be > compelling enough for me to do some testing, at least, were I in this > situation. Going this route would also make switch latency somewhat more > relevant. a lot more relevant. I wonder whether the gamma idea could be redone with the kernel's netpoll interface. that's how kernel logging/dumping/debugging happens - it's a device-independent path for UDP only, and is not intrusive on the normal network stack. I also wonder where the ~50 us latency actually comes from, since I don't believe it really scales with cpu speed. for instance, suppose you used UDP; could you make a faster MPI? if UDP is a problem (kernel buffering perhaps), then how about using MMAP_RING (via pcap), perhaps?
- Previous message: [Beowulf] New beowulf recommendations
- Next message: [Beowulf] New beowulf recommendations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
