[Beowulf] New beowulf recommendations
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mattijs Janssens m.janssens at opencfd.co.ukWed Sep 12 09:57:32 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] New beowulf recommendations
- Next message: [Beowulf] Big storage
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Monday 10 September 2007 01:12, Geoff Jacobs wrote: > What is GAMMA like for stability these days? > It's efficiency would be compelling enough for > me to do some testing, at least, were I in this > situation. Going this route would also make > switch latency somewhat more relevant. GAMMA seems to be stable these days. We have run succesfully with a version two versions before the current one. Before that there were indeed problems but they seem to have been fixed. Could be interesting to ask the author of GAMMA to see why he didn't use netpoll/mmap_ring (no idea what they are I'm afraid) and whether it would be useful. I'd be certainly interested in a protocol which is less intrusive than GAMMA. Mattijs -- Mattijs Janssens OpenCFD Ltd. 9 Albert Road, Caversham, Reading RG4 7AN. Tel: +44 (0)118 9471030 Email: M.Janssens at OpenCFD.co.uk URL: http://www.OpenCFD.co.uk
- Previous message: [Beowulf] New beowulf recommendations
- Next message: [Beowulf] Big storage
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
