[Beowulf] best linux distribution
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Tim Carlson tim.carlson at pnl.govMon Oct 8 08:44:52 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] best linux distribution - precisely!
- Next message: [Beowulf] Memory limit enforcement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> From: Gerry Creager <gerry.creager at tamu.edu> > Subject: Re: [Beowulf] best linux distribution > To: Seyed Abouzar Najafi Shoshtari <anajafi at mail.ipm.ir> > Cc: beowulf at beowulf.org > Message-ID: <470A2F4B.5050108 at tamu.edu> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > <NOMEX> > Fedora core 6 is where I'd start today. SuSE 10.x is a very good second > choice. We've also tried ROCKS and haven't been too impressed. ROCKS > installs easily and replicates to the nodes but FC6 and kickstart is > just too easy and offers a bit more usability in our experience > </nomex> > > gerry I'm not exactly sure what you mean by Rocks "replicates" to the nodes. All the nodes in a Rocks cluster are built using kickstart and you can modify the package list, disk layout, etc through editing of XML files. http://www.rocksclusters.org/rocks-documentation/4.3/customization.html Tim Carlson Voice: (509) 376 3423 Email: Tim.Carlson at pnl.gov Pacific Northwest National Laboratory HPCaNS: High Performance Computing and Networking Services
- Previous message: [Beowulf] best linux distribution - precisely!
- Next message: [Beowulf] Memory limit enforcement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
