[Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Toon Knapen toon.knapen at gmail.comWed Dec 12 04:08:31 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Next message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 12/12/07, Joe Landman <landman at scalableinformatics.com> wrote: > > This is why I note that talking about MPI vs OpenMP and other > pseudo-debates generates mostly heat and very little light. Reminds me > of editor battles, shell scripting battles ... I agree that discussions like these easily degenerate. That is actually one of the reasons why I'm looking for authoritive documents discussion the difference between both approaches. Such documents could come in handy when discussing the strategy to use concerning parallelisation of a project to bring the discussion forward in an objective way. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20071212/5e556f1d/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Next message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list