[Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comTue Dec 11 15:07:36 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Next message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Greg Lindahl wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 08:52:11AM -0500, Joe Landman wrote: > >> On the contrary, it is precisely because people are asking "how should I >> parallelize" that they need to ask the basic question of "where does my >> code spend time for my problems." > > OK, so say I have a garden-variety finite-difference code. I know how [... deletia ...] Greg, you missed my point, entirely. By a wide margin. This is why I note that talking about MPI vs OpenMP and other pseudo-debates generates mostly heat and very little light. Reminds me of editor battles, shell scripting battles ... Bowing out of this part of the discussion, so no more heat is generated. -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics LLC, email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com http://jackrabbit.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423 fax : +1 866 888 3112 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Next message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
