[Beowulf] Static Compilation versus Dynamic Compilation
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mattijs Janssens m.janssens at opencfd.co.ukMon Mar 27 03:29:13 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Static Compilation versus Dynamic Compilation
- Next message: [Beowulf] Pah!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Static linkage should run faster. There is one less jump through the symbol table. Ivan Silvestre Paganini Marin wrote: > Hello everybody at beowulf list. I am compiling my application using PGI > compilers for fortran 95, and some libraries, like fftw, lapack and > scalapack (from PGI or not, like ACML). I am curious to see if a static > compilated program is fastest than a dynamic one. Static has it's > advantages (I will be running this application on several nodes, so if > it is dynamic I will have to install the libraries on each node, etc), > but still don't know if it is fastest. > Does anybody has a clue? > > Thank you. > > Ivan Marin > Laboratório de Física Computacional > Instituto de Física de São Carlos > Universidade de São Paulo - Brasil > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > >
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Static Compilation versus Dynamic Compilation
- Next message: [Beowulf] Pah!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
