[Beowulf] Question on hgh performance, low cost Fileserver
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Andrew Piskorski atp at piskorski.comTue Nov 22 12:58:25 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Question on hgh performance, low cost Fileserver
- Next message: [Beowulf] Question on hgh performance, low cost Fileserver
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 10:25:25AM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:49:09AM +0000, John Hearns wrote: > > > Also look at http://www.drbd.org/ which might be the cat's pyjamas for > > this application. > > I have a HA NFS server in the rack (dual mini-ITX with a 300 GB > drive each) which are kept in sync via DRBD. Bonnie++ said something > about 2-3 MByte/s, so mini-ITX are quite underpowered for the application. That seems like awful disk performance. But, why would that have anything to do per-se with is being a mini-ITX motherboard? If its PCI and IDE chipsets are ok, and Linux recognizes them correctly, then the disk should work just as well as on a larger motherboard, right? Did you use the hdparm -i -I -tT options to check that Linux isn't putting the disk controller into the wrong mode? -- Andrew Piskorski <atp at piskorski.com> http://www.piskorski.com/
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Question on hgh performance, low cost Fileserver
- Next message: [Beowulf] Question on hgh performance, low cost Fileserver
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
