[Beowulf] Question on hgh performance, low cost Fileserver
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Eugen Leitl eugen at leitl.orgTue Nov 22 01:25:25 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Question on hgh performance, low cost Fileserver
- Next message: [Beowulf] Question on hgh performance, low cost Fileserver
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:49:09AM +0000, John Hearns wrote: > Also look at http://www.drbd.org/ which might be the cat's pyjamas for > this application. I have a HA NFS server in the rack (dual mini-ITX with a 300 GB drive each) which are kept in sync via DRBD. Bonnie++ said something about 2-3 MByte/s, so mini-ITX are quite underpowered for the application. I'm going to play with a Sun Fire X2100 with a SATA RAID 1 configuration (let's see how zfs and Linux RAID compare). These could be useful building blocks for a distributed file system. Another approach (suggested by Jeff Waugh) is to use AoE + GFS or OCFS2. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.leitl.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20051122/1a7a8583/attachment.bin
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Question on hgh performance, low cost Fileserver
- Next message: [Beowulf] Question on hgh performance, low cost Fileserver
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
