Subject: [Beowulf] Re: SGE + policy
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joshua Baker-LePain jlb17 at duke.eduWed Jun 2 10:56:59 PDT 2004
- Previous message: Subject: [Beowulf] Re: SGE + policy
- Next message: [Beowulf] KVM to a compute node
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 at 10:45am, Lombard, David N wrote > From: Joshua Baker-LePain; Wednesday, June 02, 2004 7:39 AM > > > >A slight correction -- FlexLM considers 1 license to be user at host. So > >foo at node1 can fire up as many Matlab sessions as foo likes, and it'll > >still be 1 license. But foo at node2 or bar at node1 would each be another > >license. > > FLEXlm does no such thing; what you've described is a per-ISV or per-app > issue. > > License policy is controlled the FLEXlm vendor daemon, written by the > ISV. There are many basic licensing models available, with even more > models possible through vendor daemon programming. Ah, thanks for the correction. Indeed, I first typed "Matlab considers...", but figured (wrongly) that it was FlexLM doing the considering. -- Joshua Baker-LePain Department of Biomedical Engineering Duke University
- Previous message: Subject: [Beowulf] Re: SGE + policy
- Next message: [Beowulf] KVM to a compute node
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
