Subject: [Beowulf] Re: SGE + policy
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Lombard, David N david.n.lombard at intel.comWed Jun 2 10:45:34 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Redmond is at it, again
- Next message: Subject: [Beowulf] Re: SGE + policy
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
From: Joshua Baker-LePain; Wednesday, June 02, 2004 7:39 AM > >A slight correction -- FlexLM considers 1 license to be user at host. So >foo at node1 can fire up as many Matlab sessions as foo likes, and it'll >still be 1 license. But foo at node2 or bar at node1 would each be another >license. FLEXlm does no such thing; what you've described is a per-ISV or per-app issue. License policy is controlled the FLEXlm vendor daemon, written by the ISV. There are many basic licensing models available, with even more models possible through vendor daemon programming. -- David N. Lombard My comments represent my opinions, not those of Intel Corporation.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Redmond is at it, again
- Next message: Subject: [Beowulf] Re: SGE + policy
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list