heat, Transmeta chips and Sys Admin costs (was RE: disadvantages of a linux cluster)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
graham.mullier at syngenta.com graham.mullier at syngenta.comWed Nov 13 02:44:00 PST 2002
- Previous message: Trouble spawning slaves in pvm
- Next message: Oracle releases IEEE 1394 clustering libraries
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I hadn't noticed the paper (so thanks for the repost) but don't agree with everything in the intro - specifically the point about RISC chip complexity and power draw/heat output: The transmeta chips are clearly low-consumption, low heat output chips (a Good Thing), while P4, IA64 are hot, very hot (not so good). However, the MIPS chips are nowhere near as hot as the Intel chips - see the recent publicity about the 16cpu/4U compute brick for the SGI Origin 3900 ["The R14000A only consumes 17 watts of power." - http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=44763&cid=4643891]. What's the position with other RISC chips (HP, IBM)? The other point I'm not happy about is the extrapolation from 9 months of trouble-free operation to a zero downtime cost vs other options. Makes it looks too much like they've decided what the answer should be and they're working back from that to define the itemised costs. Perhaps I'm being unfair but 9 months seems like a very small sample when compared to the data that will have gone in to the other options. However, it is very good to see this, as I've been interested in the TM chips for a while, so seeing a paper about this sort of very high density config is useful. Graham Graham Mullier Chemoinformatics Team Leader, Chemistry Design Group, Syngenta, Bracknell, RG42 6EY, UK. direct line: +44 (0) 1344 414163 mailto:Graham.Mullier at syngenta.com -----Original Message----- From: M A Suzen [mailto:mehmet.suzen at bristol.ac.uk] Sent: 12 November 2002 20:16 To: Sam Daniel; beowulf at beowulf.org Subject: Re: disadvantages of a linux cluster Hi, Any body notice System Administration cost in table 5. --On 12 November 2002 11:47am -0400 Sam Daniel <samhdaniel at earthlink.net> wrote: > http://public.lanl.gov/feng/icpp02.pdf _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
- Previous message: Trouble spawning slaves in pvm
- Next message: Oracle releases IEEE 1394 clustering libraries
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
