Linux memory leak?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Donald Becker becker at scyld.comFri Mar 1 09:40:25 PST 2002
- Previous message: Linux memory leak?
- Next message: Linux memory leak?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Alan Scheinine wrote: > > Sometimes (e.g. after 14 days of > normal operation) our nodes report unusually high memory usage even > without any user processes active. > > Do you have a problem with paging to swap space? My experience > with Red Hat 6.2 is that memory fills up with everything I have > used, such as files that have been read. But that space is given > to new processes when needed. It seems that as much as possible is > cached into memory. There is a specific problem with the 2.4 kernels before 2.4.10, and 2.4.9 specifically. The "lost" memory is _not_ being used as buffer cache. Instead it is unreferenced pages that the VM subsystem either takes a long time to put on the free list, or are lost for all time. This can be demonstrated by running a program that consumes a large amount of data memory e.g. 1.5GB on a 2GB system used for intermediate results. When you run the same program a second time, there isn't enough free memory and random processes are killed because of the memory shortage. Most Linux users don't notice this flaw because they run many smaller programs that easily fit into the memory of a 2GB box. Donald Becker becker at scyld.com Scyld Computing Corporation http://www.scyld.com 410 Severn Ave. Suite 210 Second Generation Beowulf Clusters Annapolis MD 21403 410-990-9993
- Previous message: Linux memory leak?
- Next message: Linux memory leak?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
