Huinalu Linux SuperCluster
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Ron Brightwell rbbrigh at valeria.mp.sandia.govThu Mar 15 11:12:05 PST 2001
- Previous message: Cluster and RAID 5 Array bottleneck.( I believe)
- Next message: Huinalu Linux SuperCluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > > Actually, no it's not -- at least not for a cluster intended to support > > parallel apps. The Siberia Cplant cluster at Sandia that is currently > > #82 on the top 500 list has a peak theoretical perfomance of 580 GFLOPS. > > It has demonstrated (with the MPLinpack benchmark) 247.6 GFLOPS. The latest > > Cplant cluster, called Antarctica, has 1024+ 466 MHz Alpha nodes, with a > > peak theoretical performance of more than 954 GFLOPS. > > The last NCSA Linux cluster (Urbana-Champaign, IL) provides 512 > dual PIII 1GHz, so a theoritical peak of 1 TFLOPS : > http://access.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Headlines/01Headlines/010116.IBM.html I didn't think that machine had been deployed yet, since the above press release says it will be installed in the Summer. I restricted the Antarctica number to what we currently have up and running as a parallel machine. There are another 400+ 466 MHz Alphas sitting next those 1024 nodes that will be integrated in the next few weeks. And thoeretical peak performance of a theoretical machine accurately measures your ability to do math... > > > Keep in mind that peak theoretical performance accurately measures your ability > > to spend money, while MPLinpack performance accurately measures your ability > > to seek pr -- I mean it measures the upper bound on compute performance from > > a parallel app. > > Very true (actually, it measures the upper bound on compute > performance of a dense linear algebra double precision > computation, which indeed covers a large set of // apps. There is > a lot of other codes that do not behave like LU, specially for the > ratio computation/communication). Yes. This was an attempt at humor rather than an exact characterization. (Do // apps scale worse than || apps? :) > > I don't know MPLinpack. Don't you mean HPLinpack ? Sorry, this may be Sandia terminology -- massively parallel linpack. I was speaking of the benchmark and not the acutal code. The measuements I quoted were using a Sandia-developed version of the solver, but we have been using the HPLinpack code from UTK since it was released. -Ron
- Previous message: Cluster and RAID 5 Array bottleneck.( I believe)
- Next message: Huinalu Linux SuperCluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
