Aces' Hardware comparison of FPU performance (Athlon vs P4)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Robert G. Brown rgb at phy.duke.eduFri Jun 29 10:59:43 PDT 2001
- Previous message: Aces' Hardware comparison of FPU performance (Athlon vs P4)
- Next message: Beowulf @ Celera
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, James Cownie wrote: > Probably worth a look, if you're in the market for new nodes for FPU > intensive work (the Intel compiler is available in beta on Linux, > after all) :- > > http://www.aceshardware.com/Spades/read.php?article_id=40000189 > > Fundamental conclusion is that the P4 flies when the compiler manages > to use SSE2 vectorisation (and your code isn't bandwidth limited ;-) > For "real" codes like SPECFP SSE2 doesn't win much. By the way, filled with curiousity by some of the week's discussion I browsed the gnu gcc development site and learned that: a) gcc 3.0 was released 6/8. It will likely take a bit to see it out in rpm form as it has to be carefully tested against the kernel (obviously). b) gcc 3.1+ is out in beta, and has SSE 1&2. I'm hoping/praying maybe going to have time to grab and build a copy and rerun some benchmarks on Athlons with and without the SSE instructions. In any event, the SSE issue is one whose days are clearly numbered. Very shortly gcc will have full support in the mainline distribution. rgb -- Robert G. Brown http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/ Duke University Dept. of Physics, Box 90305 Durham, N.C. 27708-0305 Phone: 1-919-660-2567 Fax: 919-660-2525 email:rgb at phy.duke.edu
- Previous message: Aces' Hardware comparison of FPU performance (Athlon vs P4)
- Next message: Beowulf @ Celera
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
