Help!!!About Channel Bonding!
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jakob Østergaard jakob at unthought.netThu Jun 21 21:18:26 PDT 2001
- Previous message: Help!!!About Channel Bonding!
- Next message: SCE V1.0 Announcement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 06:57:48AM +0800, ÁõöÎ½Ü wrote: > Hello,everyone > I receive some instrunctions and check my setup again.I find that I can use > two NIC in each machine,although the performance only increase 10~20%.The Please measure with netperf (http://www.netperf.org/netperf/NetperfPage.html) instead of rcp. Attached to this e-mail is a very short Perl script I hacked up once to check interface throughput. Run this on your nodes while benchmarking, to see that both/all cards both receive and transmit. Some sample output from a 2-NIC machine running netserver (from the NetPerf package): --------- ETH 0 RX: 11685.931640625 KB/sec TX: 674.767578125 KB/sec ETH 1 RX: 11785.884765625 KB/sec TX: 673.419921875 KB/sec ETH 0 RX: 11373.62890625 KB/sec TX: 655.9453125 KB/sec ETH 1 RX: 11648.318359375 KB/sec TX: 656.234375 KB/sec ETH 0 RX: 11609.3515625 KB/sec TX: 676.587890625 KB/sec ETH 1 RX: 11781.126953125 KB/sec TX: 678.59765625 KB/sec --------- > package loss a little relative to use only one NIC.I use "rsh somefile > host:/home" to test.But if I use three NIC,the collision seems serious.One > Card can not work and the other two have bad performance.By the way,my > kernal is 2.2.14-5.0 Mr Jobok tell me to check the "Trunking",but I do really Ok - I am using 2.4.4 here - I don't know how well bonding works 2.2. Comments, anyone ?? I suggest you run the attached script while either running rcp or netperf. It will show whether your kernel properly sends data out on several NICs, and if your switch properly transmits data to several NICs in each box. If only one NIC does TX, either your configuration is wrong on the machine or your kernel can't do proper bonding. If only one NIC does RX, something's wrong on the switch. Please let us know what you find out. > not know how to check it. And one more question is :is the VLan > needed?Because of money,I only use one swither. You can set trunking parameters in the switch setup (telnet to the switch). VLan is *not* needed. The switch will do what it is supposed to, if it's configuration is left untouched. If any special trunking/bundling configuration is done, it will *not* work. But if you don't know how to configure trunking, I guess you're on the safe side - it should work for you then ;) > > Thanks for everyone ! > Indeed, good luck :) -- ................................................................ : jakob at unthought.net : And I see the elder races, : :.........................: putrid forms of man : : Jakob Østergaard : See him rise and claim the earth, : : OZ9ABN : his downfall is at hand. : :.........................:............{Konkhra}...............: -------------- next part -------------- #!/usr/bin/perl -w # # Use and abuse as you see fit. # Written in 2001 - by Jakob Oestergaard (jakob at unthought.net) # # Log interface activity # # Inter-| Receive | Transmit # face |bytes packets errs drop fifo frame compressed multicast|bytes packets errs drop fifo colls carrier compressed # lo: 86008 684 0 0 0 0 0 0 86008 684 0 0 0 0 0 0 # eth0:896249571 1017056 0 0 0 7 0 0 356538899 751902 0 0 0 0 0 0 # # ^eth(\d+):(\d+)(\s+(\d+)){7}(\d+)(\d+(\d+)){7}\s*$ # # Log $1 $2 $9 # use strict; my %oldrx = (); my %oldtx = (); while(1) { open(DF,"/proc/net/dev") or die "Couldn't open devfile"; while(<DF>) { if(/^\s*eth(\d+):\s*(\d+)(\s+(\d+)){7}\s+(\d+)(\s+(\d+)){7}\s*$/) { if(defined $oldrx{$1}) { my $rd = $2 - $oldrx{$1}; $oldrx{$1} = $2; my $td = $5 - $oldtx{$1}; $oldtx{$1} = $5; $td = $td / 1024; $rd = $rd / 1024; if($td >= 0 && $rd >= 0) { print "ETH $1 RX: $rd KB/sec TX: $td KB/sec\n"; } } else { $oldrx{$1} = $2; $oldtx{$1} = $5; } } } sleep(1); }
- Previous message: Help!!!About Channel Bonding!
- Next message: SCE V1.0 Announcement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
