Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

partitioning HD for use of swap & for booting

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Nordwall, Douglas J Nordwall at pnl.gov
Fri Jun 1 09:37:04 PDT 2001


I guess the question I have got to ask is if it is still practical to run with
2xmemory when you start reaching up into large memory? I assume this is only if
you ever hit swap...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bogdan Costescu [mailto:bogdan.costescu at iwr.uni-heidelberg.de]
> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 8:59 AM
> To: Robert G. Brown
> Cc: Kent Heyward; Beowulf List
> Subject: Re: partitioning HD for use of swap & for booting
> 
> 
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Robert G. Brown wrote:
> 
> > I've heard that 2x memory is the MINIMUM recommended for the
> > 2.4 kernels for performance reasons.
> 
> This was specifically mentioned when 2.4.0 was launched as it's an
> important difference w.r.t. 2.2 line.
> 
> > I'd even speculate that a 2.4 kernel
> > with lots of memory but small swapspace is a better 
> performer than a 2.4
> > kernel with barely enough memory but plenty of swapspace.
> 
> No, a 2.4 kernel with small swap space will perform poorly 
> especially with
> latest (2.4.4, 2.4.5) kernels. There was/is a discussion on lkml about
> that; some people say that from 2.4.0, with every new release, the
> behaviour got worse. Some even say that 2.4.x should not be considered
> "stable series" because of the VM problems.
> 
> > Linux has a very decent memory management system, and generally ...
> 
> I guess the more appropiate form is "should have".
> 
> Please don't take me as a VM expert. I'm subscribed to lkml 
> and read most
> of the messages, that's the source for all the above info. However, as
> Linux workstation user, I've noticed a clear degradation 
> between 2.2 and
> 2.4, even some stability problems.
> (To get back on the beowulf track) Until 2.4 behaves at least 
> as good as
> 2.2 in all aspects, I'm only running 2.2 on the clusters that 
> I administer.
> 
> Back on the swap track: we're on the beowulf list and this 
> question should
> be in fact related to usage of swap in clusters. I always found a bad
> ideea running a parallel application that doesn't fit in RAM (well,
> probably a very coarse grained one might work OK). So I'd 
> second Robert's
> suggestion to buy more RAM if possible.
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> Bogdan Costescu
> 
> IWR - Interdisziplinaeres Zentrum fuer Wissenschaftliches Rechnen
> Universitaet Heidelberg, INF 368, D-69120 Heidelberg, GERMANY
> Telephone: +49 6221 54 8869, Telefax: +49 6221 54 8868
> E-mail: Bogdan.Costescu at IWR.Uni-Heidelberg.De
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
> To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) 
> visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
> 




More information about the Beowulf mailing list