Mathematics of gigabit question
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jerker Nyberg jerker at update.uu.seFri Dec 7 14:43:00 PST 2001
- Previous message: Mathematics of gigabit question
- Next message: diskless nodes? (was Re: Xbox clusters?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Greg Lindahl wrote: > "small" megabytes are only used for disks by the marketing (and now > technical) people. They mostly haven't invaded the rest of the > industry, so I've yet to see a technical person use "small" megabytes > for anything but disks. But you need to know the actual clock rates; > everyone rounds them. So if you send a megabyte (computer memory) over a computer network (where you use M=10**6) with megabit per second it will take 8.3886 seconds? And sending a kilobyte over a kilobit per second computer network will take 8.192 seconds? Am I strange that feel... hmmm... personally offended by that? :-) http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html Personally I prefer using (in my opinion) real units (10**3 etc). If I use the other ones (2**10 etc) I usually have to define what I mean every time. Unless I use the new prefixes, but then nobody understands me anyway. Regards, Jerker Nyberg, Uppsala, Sweden. (Sorry if I'm too off topic with this post... Now I go back to wondering why this new DLT VS80 tapebackup in a Dell 2500 fileserver believes every tape is WR_PROT. Hmm. Red Hat 7.2.)
- Previous message: Mathematics of gigabit question
- Next message: diskless nodes? (was Re: Xbox clusters?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
