Mathematics of gigabit question
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at conservativecomputer.comFri Dec 7 11:55:34 PST 2001
- Previous message: Mathematics of gigabit question
- Next message: Mathematics of gigabit question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 11:12:49AM -0600, Jared Hodge wrote: > 33,000,000 cycles/sec (that's 33 million cycles per second or 33 Mhz) * > 4 bytes/cycle (32 bits = 4 bytes) = 132,000,000 bytes/sec (132 small > MB/sec, or 125.8 real MB/sec). Nope. 33 Mhz is really 33.333333 MHz, and so the actual sustained bandwidth is 133 real MByte/sec. If you look on my Myrinet experiences page, you'll find the actual sustained performance of PCI busses talking to Myrinet cards is (of course) less than ideal, but some motherboards do quite well. The best example of 33mhz/32bits is 128 real MBytes/sec, and at 64bits/66mhz is 455 "real" MB/s. "small" megabytes are only used for disks by the marketing (and now technical) people. They mostly haven't invaded the rest of the industry, so I've yet to see a technical person use "small" megabytes for anything but disks. But you need to know the actual clock rates; everyone rounds them. http://www.conservativecomputer.com/myrinet/perf.html It's likely that gigE cards don't have a significantly better implementation of the card/PCI interface. But of course processing the TCP stack is extremely expensive, so that's the main limit. greg
- Previous message: Mathematics of gigabit question
- Next message: Mathematics of gigabit question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
