[Beowulf] RE: Capitalization Rates - How often should you replace a cluster? (resent - 1st sending wasn't posted ).

Geoff Jacobs gdjacobs at gmail.com
Tue Jan 20 08:37:50 PST 2009

Mike Davis wrote:
> Lux, James P wrote:
>> On 1/19/09 11:14 PM, "Jon Aquilina" <eagles051387 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> in all honesty is there a need really to replace the cluster. why not
>>> just add
>>> onto it?
>> 1) If all the processors work at the same speed, it's "easier" to
>> distribute
>> work among them, especially if there are synchronization steps
>> periodically,
>> where all the work quanta need to be aligned and redistributed for the
>> next
>> step.
>> 2) Newer machines do more computing/kWh of electricity, in general, so it
>> reduces operating costs.
> Another reason to replace machines is upkeep and staff time. Older
> machines fail more often and require more attention than newer ones.

Generally, yes, that is the conventional wisdom. However, sometimes
better the devil you know...

Geoffrey D. Jacobs

More information about the Beowulf mailing list